matlab® compiled command line tool Search Results


non matlab subroutines  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc non matlab subroutines
Non Matlab Subroutines, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/non matlab subroutines/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
non matlab subroutines - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab compiler toolbox  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab compiler toolbox
Matlab Compiler Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab compiler toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab compiler toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
compiler runtime (mcr)  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc compiler runtime (mcr)
Compiler Runtime (Mcr), supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/compiler runtime (mcr)/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
compiler runtime (mcr) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab compiler software  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab compiler software
Matlab Compiler Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab compiler software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab compiler software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab c-compiler  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab c-compiler
Matlab C Compiler, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab c-compiler/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab c-compiler - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab 2017b  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab 2017b
Single neuron responses to auditory and visual cues during three different variations of a Multi-modal center-out iBCI task. ( A – C ) Task sequences for three variants of a Multi-modal center-out task consisting of different cue presentation orders: auditory-visual (AV) task sequence ( A ), visual-auditory (VA) task sequence ( B ), and the simultaneous cue (A + V) presentation sequence ( C ). ( D – F ) Example raster-histograms for a single MFG neuron ( top row, yellow banner ) and PCG neuron ( bottom row, teal banner ) during the AV task sequence ( D ), the VA task sequence ( E ), and the A + V task sequence ( F ). Averaged firing rate traces for each target (smoothed with a 200 ms Gaussian kernel) are presented under each raster plot. White triangles (∇) represent the instructional cue onsets; black triangles represent the go cue onset; Ear symbol represents an auditory cue; eye symbol represents a visual cue (trial day 356, MFG channel 17, unit 1, PCG channel 12, unit 3). ( G – I ) Percentages of MFG ( yellow line s) and PCG neurons ( teal lines ) with responsive ( broken line ) and selective ( solid line ) firing patterns during the AV ( G ), the VA ( H ), and the A + V ( I ) task sequence. Neurons were classified as responsive if they displayed firing rates significantly different from baseline during task performance (significance level = 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test), and selective if firing rates differed significantly across targets. This figure was compiled using MATLAB <t>2017b,</t> MathWorks software and labeled using Adobe Illustrator CC 2018.
Matlab 2017b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab 2017b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab 2017b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
compiler software development kit sdk  (MathWorks Inc)
94
MathWorks Inc compiler software development kit sdk
Single neuron responses to auditory and visual cues during three different variations of a Multi-modal center-out iBCI task. ( A – C ) Task sequences for three variants of a Multi-modal center-out task consisting of different cue presentation orders: auditory-visual (AV) task sequence ( A ), visual-auditory (VA) task sequence ( B ), and the simultaneous cue (A + V) presentation sequence ( C ). ( D – F ) Example raster-histograms for a single MFG neuron ( top row, yellow banner ) and PCG neuron ( bottom row, teal banner ) during the AV task sequence ( D ), the VA task sequence ( E ), and the A + V task sequence ( F ). Averaged firing rate traces for each target (smoothed with a 200 ms Gaussian kernel) are presented under each raster plot. White triangles (∇) represent the instructional cue onsets; black triangles represent the go cue onset; Ear symbol represents an auditory cue; eye symbol represents a visual cue (trial day 356, MFG channel 17, unit 1, PCG channel 12, unit 3). ( G – I ) Percentages of MFG ( yellow line s) and PCG neurons ( teal lines ) with responsive ( broken line ) and selective ( solid line ) firing patterns during the AV ( G ), the VA ( H ), and the A + V ( I ) task sequence. Neurons were classified as responsive if they displayed firing rates significantly different from baseline during task performance (significance level = 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test), and selective if firing rates differed significantly across targets. This figure was compiled using MATLAB <t>2017b,</t> MathWorks software and labeled using Adobe Illustrator CC 2018.
Compiler Software Development Kit Sdk, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/compiler software development kit sdk/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
compiler software development kit sdk - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab timer object  (MathWorks Inc)
93
MathWorks Inc matlab timer object
Single neuron responses to auditory and visual cues during three different variations of a Multi-modal center-out iBCI task. ( A – C ) Task sequences for three variants of a Multi-modal center-out task consisting of different cue presentation orders: auditory-visual (AV) task sequence ( A ), visual-auditory (VA) task sequence ( B ), and the simultaneous cue (A + V) presentation sequence ( C ). ( D – F ) Example raster-histograms for a single MFG neuron ( top row, yellow banner ) and PCG neuron ( bottom row, teal banner ) during the AV task sequence ( D ), the VA task sequence ( E ), and the A + V task sequence ( F ). Averaged firing rate traces for each target (smoothed with a 200 ms Gaussian kernel) are presented under each raster plot. White triangles (∇) represent the instructional cue onsets; black triangles represent the go cue onset; Ear symbol represents an auditory cue; eye symbol represents a visual cue (trial day 356, MFG channel 17, unit 1, PCG channel 12, unit 3). ( G – I ) Percentages of MFG ( yellow line s) and PCG neurons ( teal lines ) with responsive ( broken line ) and selective ( solid line ) firing patterns during the AV ( G ), the VA ( H ), and the A + V ( I ) task sequence. Neurons were classified as responsive if they displayed firing rates significantly different from baseline during task performance (significance level = 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test), and selective if firing rates differed significantly across targets. This figure was compiled using MATLAB <t>2017b,</t> MathWorks software and labeled using Adobe Illustrator CC 2018.
Matlab Timer Object, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab timer object/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab timer object - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
cpg program  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc cpg program
Single neuron responses to auditory and visual cues during three different variations of a Multi-modal center-out iBCI task. ( A – C ) Task sequences for three variants of a Multi-modal center-out task consisting of different cue presentation orders: auditory-visual (AV) task sequence ( A ), visual-auditory (VA) task sequence ( B ), and the simultaneous cue (A + V) presentation sequence ( C ). ( D – F ) Example raster-histograms for a single MFG neuron ( top row, yellow banner ) and PCG neuron ( bottom row, teal banner ) during the AV task sequence ( D ), the VA task sequence ( E ), and the A + V task sequence ( F ). Averaged firing rate traces for each target (smoothed with a 200 ms Gaussian kernel) are presented under each raster plot. White triangles (∇) represent the instructional cue onsets; black triangles represent the go cue onset; Ear symbol represents an auditory cue; eye symbol represents a visual cue (trial day 356, MFG channel 17, unit 1, PCG channel 12, unit 3). ( G – I ) Percentages of MFG ( yellow line s) and PCG neurons ( teal lines ) with responsive ( broken line ) and selective ( solid line ) firing patterns during the AV ( G ), the VA ( H ), and the A + V ( I ) task sequence. Neurons were classified as responsive if they displayed firing rates significantly different from baseline during task performance (significance level = 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test), and selective if firing rates differed significantly across targets. This figure was compiled using MATLAB <t>2017b,</t> MathWorks software and labeled using Adobe Illustrator CC 2018.
Cpg Program, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cpg program/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cpg program - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
matlab r2009b  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc matlab r2009b
Single neuron responses to auditory and visual cues during three different variations of a Multi-modal center-out iBCI task. ( A – C ) Task sequences for three variants of a Multi-modal center-out task consisting of different cue presentation orders: auditory-visual (AV) task sequence ( A ), visual-auditory (VA) task sequence ( B ), and the simultaneous cue (A + V) presentation sequence ( C ). ( D – F ) Example raster-histograms for a single MFG neuron ( top row, yellow banner ) and PCG neuron ( bottom row, teal banner ) during the AV task sequence ( D ), the VA task sequence ( E ), and the A + V task sequence ( F ). Averaged firing rate traces for each target (smoothed with a 200 ms Gaussian kernel) are presented under each raster plot. White triangles (∇) represent the instructional cue onsets; black triangles represent the go cue onset; Ear symbol represents an auditory cue; eye symbol represents a visual cue (trial day 356, MFG channel 17, unit 1, PCG channel 12, unit 3). ( G – I ) Percentages of MFG ( yellow line s) and PCG neurons ( teal lines ) with responsive ( broken line ) and selective ( solid line ) firing patterns during the AV ( G ), the VA ( H ), and the A + V ( I ) task sequence. Neurons were classified as responsive if they displayed firing rates significantly different from baseline during task performance (significance level = 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test), and selective if firing rates differed significantly across targets. This figure was compiled using MATLAB <t>2017b,</t> MathWorks software and labeled using Adobe Illustrator CC 2018.
Matlab R2009b, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/matlab r2009b/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
matlab r2009b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
imgaussfilt  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc imgaussfilt
Single neuron responses to auditory and visual cues during three different variations of a Multi-modal center-out iBCI task. ( A – C ) Task sequences for three variants of a Multi-modal center-out task consisting of different cue presentation orders: auditory-visual (AV) task sequence ( A ), visual-auditory (VA) task sequence ( B ), and the simultaneous cue (A + V) presentation sequence ( C ). ( D – F ) Example raster-histograms for a single MFG neuron ( top row, yellow banner ) and PCG neuron ( bottom row, teal banner ) during the AV task sequence ( D ), the VA task sequence ( E ), and the A + V task sequence ( F ). Averaged firing rate traces for each target (smoothed with a 200 ms Gaussian kernel) are presented under each raster plot. White triangles (∇) represent the instructional cue onsets; black triangles represent the go cue onset; Ear symbol represents an auditory cue; eye symbol represents a visual cue (trial day 356, MFG channel 17, unit 1, PCG channel 12, unit 3). ( G – I ) Percentages of MFG ( yellow line s) and PCG neurons ( teal lines ) with responsive ( broken line ) and selective ( solid line ) firing patterns during the AV ( G ), the VA ( H ), and the A + V ( I ) task sequence. Neurons were classified as responsive if they displayed firing rates significantly different from baseline during task performance (significance level = 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test), and selective if firing rates differed significantly across targets. This figure was compiled using MATLAB <t>2017b,</t> MathWorks software and labeled using Adobe Illustrator CC 2018.
Imgaussfilt, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/imgaussfilt/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
imgaussfilt - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
computational package  (MathWorks Inc)
90
MathWorks Inc computational package
Single neuron responses to auditory and visual cues during three different variations of a Multi-modal center-out iBCI task. ( A – C ) Task sequences for three variants of a Multi-modal center-out task consisting of different cue presentation orders: auditory-visual (AV) task sequence ( A ), visual-auditory (VA) task sequence ( B ), and the simultaneous cue (A + V) presentation sequence ( C ). ( D – F ) Example raster-histograms for a single MFG neuron ( top row, yellow banner ) and PCG neuron ( bottom row, teal banner ) during the AV task sequence ( D ), the VA task sequence ( E ), and the A + V task sequence ( F ). Averaged firing rate traces for each target (smoothed with a 200 ms Gaussian kernel) are presented under each raster plot. White triangles (∇) represent the instructional cue onsets; black triangles represent the go cue onset; Ear symbol represents an auditory cue; eye symbol represents a visual cue (trial day 356, MFG channel 17, unit 1, PCG channel 12, unit 3). ( G – I ) Percentages of MFG ( yellow line s) and PCG neurons ( teal lines ) with responsive ( broken line ) and selective ( solid line ) firing patterns during the AV ( G ), the VA ( H ), and the A + V ( I ) task sequence. Neurons were classified as responsive if they displayed firing rates significantly different from baseline during task performance (significance level = 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test), and selective if firing rates differed significantly across targets. This figure was compiled using MATLAB <t>2017b,</t> MathWorks software and labeled using Adobe Illustrator CC 2018.
Computational Package, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/computational package/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
computational package - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Single neuron responses to auditory and visual cues during three different variations of a Multi-modal center-out iBCI task. ( A – C ) Task sequences for three variants of a Multi-modal center-out task consisting of different cue presentation orders: auditory-visual (AV) task sequence ( A ), visual-auditory (VA) task sequence ( B ), and the simultaneous cue (A + V) presentation sequence ( C ). ( D – F ) Example raster-histograms for a single MFG neuron ( top row, yellow banner ) and PCG neuron ( bottom row, teal banner ) during the AV task sequence ( D ), the VA task sequence ( E ), and the A + V task sequence ( F ). Averaged firing rate traces for each target (smoothed with a 200 ms Gaussian kernel) are presented under each raster plot. White triangles (∇) represent the instructional cue onsets; black triangles represent the go cue onset; Ear symbol represents an auditory cue; eye symbol represents a visual cue (trial day 356, MFG channel 17, unit 1, PCG channel 12, unit 3). ( G – I ) Percentages of MFG ( yellow line s) and PCG neurons ( teal lines ) with responsive ( broken line ) and selective ( solid line ) firing patterns during the AV ( G ), the VA ( H ), and the A + V ( I ) task sequence. Neurons were classified as responsive if they displayed firing rates significantly different from baseline during task performance (significance level = 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test), and selective if firing rates differed significantly across targets. This figure was compiled using MATLAB 2017b, MathWorks software and labeled using Adobe Illustrator CC 2018.

Journal: Scientific Reports

Article Title: Auditory cues reveal intended movement information in middle frontal gyrus neuronal ensemble activity of a person with tetraplegia

doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77616-8

Figure Lengend Snippet: Single neuron responses to auditory and visual cues during three different variations of a Multi-modal center-out iBCI task. ( A – C ) Task sequences for three variants of a Multi-modal center-out task consisting of different cue presentation orders: auditory-visual (AV) task sequence ( A ), visual-auditory (VA) task sequence ( B ), and the simultaneous cue (A + V) presentation sequence ( C ). ( D – F ) Example raster-histograms for a single MFG neuron ( top row, yellow banner ) and PCG neuron ( bottom row, teal banner ) during the AV task sequence ( D ), the VA task sequence ( E ), and the A + V task sequence ( F ). Averaged firing rate traces for each target (smoothed with a 200 ms Gaussian kernel) are presented under each raster plot. White triangles (∇) represent the instructional cue onsets; black triangles represent the go cue onset; Ear symbol represents an auditory cue; eye symbol represents a visual cue (trial day 356, MFG channel 17, unit 1, PCG channel 12, unit 3). ( G – I ) Percentages of MFG ( yellow line s) and PCG neurons ( teal lines ) with responsive ( broken line ) and selective ( solid line ) firing patterns during the AV ( G ), the VA ( H ), and the A + V ( I ) task sequence. Neurons were classified as responsive if they displayed firing rates significantly different from baseline during task performance (significance level = 0.01; Kruskal–Wallis (KW) test), and selective if firing rates differed significantly across targets. This figure was compiled using MATLAB 2017b, MathWorks software and labeled using Adobe Illustrator CC 2018.

Article Snippet: This figure was compiled using MATLAB 2017b, MathWorks software and labeled using Adobe Illustrator CC 2018.

Techniques: Sequencing, Software, Labeling